Toughen by Dibya Shankar Mishra for Kalikesh Singh Deo has reignited a management debate inner BJD, triggering objections from senior leaders and new hypothesis over succession under Naveen Patnaik.
![]()

Management row rekindles rigidity inner BJD after Dibya Shankar backs Kalikesh Describe: (OTV)
The inform of management has as soon as extra sparked intense debate inner Biju Janata Dal (BJD). Senior chief Dibya Shankar Mishra’s originate make stronger for Kalikesh Narayan Singh Deo as a ability convey-level chief has created ripples at some level of the occasion, drawing every backing and true resistance.
Also Learn: BJD littered with ‘multi-organ failure’; wants ‘saline make stronger’: BJP’s Jayanarayan Mishra sparks debate
Dibya Shankar, ceaselessly in most cases known as “Captain” inner political circles, argued that Kalikesh is fit to snatch on management responsibility per his functionality and competence. He said that Kalikesh possesses the talents and administrative skills required to manual the occasion in the Recount, adding that his family has a lengthy political legacy, recalling the position as soon as performed by Rajendra Narayan Singh Deo in Odisha politics.
“Kalikesh Narayan Singh Deo is a dynamic chief. He does now not lack any quality to snatch management in the Recount politics,” Dibya Shankar had said.
On the other hand, the assertion has now not gone down effectively with loads of senior BJD leaders. Musty MLAs Arun Kumar Sahoo and Ganeswar Behera strongly objected, putting ahead that every one elected representatives in the occasion are equally in a position to offering management. They wondered the relevance of succession discussions when occasion president Naveen Patnaik continues to manual the organisation.
The controversy has additional intensified amid hypothesis over inner group dynamics at some level of the occasion. The present look of senior chief Ananga Udaya Singh Deo at Naveen Nivas, followed closely by Dibya Shankar’s remarks, has added gas to political conjecture. Observers for the time being are questioning whether or now not the assertion modified into a non-public conception or section of a calculated pass by a recount faction.
Dibya Shankar’s remarks possess effectively revived the lengthy-dormant succession debate in BJD, with some political circles also linking it to makes an strive at countering the rising prominence of Sujata Karthikeyan. As discussions develop louder, the occasion finds itself as soon as extra at the centre of hypothesis over its future management route.
“BJD has now been divided into loads of factions, and all that issues is how this (Dibya Shankar’s endorsement) will doubtless be well-liked by others in the occasion and what supremo Naveen Patnaik is up to (has in his solutions). The actual person to whom Naveen has been promoting does now not possess ‘acceptability’. Furthermore, a conducive ambiance does now not exist at some level of the occasion; so that, any individual particular person (alternate management) can be acceptable to all others in the BJD,” effectively-known political analyst Prasanna Mohanty said to OTV.




