‘Disgrace’, says Donald Trump after U.S. Supreme Court strikes down his global tariffs | LIVE

Brazil’s Vice-President Geraldo Alckmin ‌talked about the ⁠U.S. Supreme Court ruling that struck down ‌President Donald Trump’s ‌sweeping tariffs ‌used to be essentially ⁠vital ⁠for the South American country, because it ‌eliminated levies namely focusing on the nation.

Talking at a ‌press convention, Alckmin, who also serves ⁠as Brazil’s pattern, industry and ‌commerce minister, known as for caution amid upcoming traits from the ‌ruling and talked about the country intends to support ⁠negotiating commerce ⁠and non-commerce factors with Washington.

-Reuters

Germany talked about it used to be in “shut contact” with the U.S. and wanted “steadiness” in commerce links, after the Supreme Court dominated unlawful most of President Donald Trump’s tariffs on international commerce.

The government “has renowned the chance of the Supreme Court. We remain in shut contact with the American govt to compose clarifications on the next steps to grab to guarantee steadiness and predictability in industrial relatives,” talked about a govt spokesman in a observation sent to AFP.

U.S. President Donald Trump suggested that the bulk commerce deals negotiated below the threat of his tariffs remained legitimate, pointing out namely India, despite the Supreme Court ruling those levies unlawful.

“The India deal is on,” Mr. Trump instructed reporters in response to a request, whereas suggesting tariffs below separate authorities would replace those overturned by the Supreme Court. “The total deals — we’re honest going to form it a obvious plan.”

-AFP

President ‌Donald Trump talked about that ‌it used to be now not ‌definite ‌if ⁠or ⁠when there could perchance be any refunds ‌after the U.S. Supreme Court ‌struck down his sweeping tariffs, ⁠adding that the ‌matter could perchance also hold years to litigate.

– Reuters

U.S. ‌President Donald Trump talked about that ‌some commerce ⁠tariffs ⁠imposed by the U.S. below ‌a rules meant for nationwide ‌emergencies would now not stand, ⁠adding that they ‌could perchance be modified by ‌different tariffs.

-Reuters

US President Donald Trump talked about this day it could per chance also hold years to catch to the underside of the precise allege of whether some $133 billion taken in from his tariffs desires to be refunded.

Mr. Trump talked about the problem used to be “now not talked about” within the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling declaring his global tariffs to be unlawful, adding: “We’ll cease up being in court docket for the next 5 years.”

– AFP

US President Donald Trump on Friday talked about he ancient tariffs to cease the battle between India and Pakistan, as he lashed out at the Supreme Court for its risk to strike down his sweeping tariffs imposed on countries at some level of the realm.

– PTI

President ‌Donald Trump instructed a ⁠briefing that ‌he met ‌with ‌Vietnam’s ⁠top ⁠leader To Lam this day, ‌and quoted him as ‌saying that the U.S. ⁠could perchance also impose ‌even extra tariffs after the ‌Supreme Court’s ruling.

-Reuters

President Donald Trump presented this day that he used to be imposing an additional global tariff of 10% on U.S. commerce partners.

Talking to reporters after the Supreme Court dominated his sweeping global tariffs unlawful, Trump talked about he would impose tariffs the spend of different authorities.

“The Supreme Court’s risk this day made a president’s ability to each and each support an eye fixed on commerce and impose tariffs extra extremely effective and extra crystal definite, rather then less,” he talked about.

-AFP

US President Donald Trump vowed this day spend different recommendations to reinstate sweeping tariffs that the Supreme Court struck down, quickly after the rebuke of his signature economic protection.

“Other conceivable decisions will now be ancient to replace those that the court docket incorrectly rejected,” Mr. Trump instructed a press convention, adding that these alternatives could perchance also moreover bring in additional revenue.

-AFP

U.S. President Donald Trump this day accused the country’s Supreme Court of being influenced by “international pursuits” after it dominated that his sweeping global tariffs are unlawful.

“It’s my conception that the court docket has been swayed by international pursuits,” Mr. Trump instructed journalists.

-AFP

President ‌Donald Trump this day ⁠talked about the U.S. Supreme ‌Court’s ruling ‌that ‌struck ⁠down ⁠his sweeping tariffs used to be “deeply disappointing” ‌and that he used to be “fully ashamed” ‌by the justices who ⁠dominated in opposition to him ‌within the 6-3 risk.

-Reuters

Trump relied on the 1977 International Emergency Financial Powers Act, or IEEPA, as justification for a ancient barrage of tariffs, even supposing that rules contains no mention of tariffs.

IEEPA, which enables the president to plan shut resources and block transactions at some level of a nationwide emergency, used to be first ancient at some level of the Iran hostage crisis. It has since been invoked for a unfold of global unrest, from the 9/11 assaults to the Syrian civil battle.

-AP

Indian exporters hold welcomed the U.S. Supreme Court’s risk hanging down tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump, saying the proceed is a large reduction to home firms suffering from the country-particular responsibilities.

Recount tank International Exchange Examine Initiative (GTRI) talked about that following this ruling, the U.S. could perchance also composed hold away the 25% reciprocal tariffs on India, then about 55% of India’s exports to the U.S. could perchance be topic to most effective the present customs responsibilities.

The ruling restores higher predictability in bilateral commerce between the 2 countries, Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO) President SC Ralhan talked about.

“The contemporary ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court hanging down the reciprocal tariffs below the International Emergency Financial Powers Act brings welcome reduction to Indian exporters suffering from country-particular responsibilities,” he talked about.

-PTI

U.S. President Donald Trump can support a press convention on Friday (February 20, 2026) to focus on the Supreme Court’s ruling in opposition to a foremost section of his tariffs, spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt talked about.

-AFP

Swiss industry affiliation Swissmem on Friday ‌instructed Switzerland to finalize a preliminary commerce contend with Washington in ⁠focus on in confidence to create appropriate easy process, despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s risk to strike ‌down President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

Switzerland used to be topic to the very ideally suited U.S. ‌tariffs in Europe when Trump ‌imposed ⁠a 39% import responsibility on ⁠its exporters’ merchandise in August. In November, Bern secured an preliminary deal that slice the tariffs to fifteen%, ‌mirroring the flee for the European Union.

Switzerland has since begun talks to formalize that agreement, which Washington has ‌been pressing to cease by the cease of the first quarter.

Swissmem talked about the government would ⁠be successfully instructed to flip that preliminary accord right into a legally binding ‌deal.

-Reuters

Because the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday struck down President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs, Justice Brett Kavanaugh referred to the tariffs imposed on India for Russian oil purchases in his dissenting conception.

Mr. Trump had imposed 25% reciprocal tariffs on India and an additional 25% punitive tariff for Delhi’s purchases of Russian oil.

In a 6-3 vote on Friday, the judges stumbled on that the International Emergency Financial Powers Act (IEEPA) doesn’t authorise the imposition of responsibilities.

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito Jr. and Kavanaugh dissented within the court docket’s risk.

“As with tariffs on international imports historically, the IEEPA tariffs on international imports at allege on this case implicate international affairs. In accordance with the Authorities, the President has leveraged the IEEPA tariffs into commerce deals with predominant trading partners, along side China, the United Kingdom, and Japan, amongst different countries.”

“….To that cease, on August 6, 2025, the President imposed tariffs on India for “without delay or in some plan importing Russian Federation oil”… And on February 6, 2026, the President reduced the tariffs on India because, according to the Authorities, India had “dedicated to end without delay or in some plan importing Russian Federation oil,” he wrote.

-PTI

Wall Avenue shares bounced on Friday after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down about a of President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs in a risk expected to mitigate inflation.

Stocks had opened decrease following disappointing US economic records. Nevertheless equities moved decisively higher after the Supreme Court dominated six-to-three that the International Emergency Financial Powers Act (IEEPA) “doesn’t authorize the President to impose tariffs.”

Come 1610 GMT, the Dow Jones Industrial Realistic used to be up 0.3% at 49,521.49.

The colossal-essentially essentially based fully S&P 500 won 0.6% to 6,901.67, whereas the tech-rich Nasdaq Composite Index jumped 1.0% to 22,914.91.

-AFP

The EU talked about that it used to be discovering out the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that stumbled on President Donald Trump exceeded his authority in imposing a swath of tariffs that upended global commerce.

“We take into epic the ruling… and are analysing it fastidiously,” EU commerce spokesman Olof Gill talked about.

“We remain in shut contact with the US administration as we gape clarity on the steps they intend to soak up response to this ruling,” he added.

“Corporations on all sides of the Atlantic count upon steadiness and predictability within the trading relationship.”

-AFP

Friday’s risk upends a core region of tariffs that Mr. Trump imposed the spend of the 1977 International Emergency Financial Powers Act, or IEEPA. That involves the “Liberation Day” tariffs the President slapped on as regards to each and each country within the realm final spring — to boot to and different IEEPA-essentially essentially based fully levies he imposed on Canada, Mexico and China. Trump also cited IEEPA to impose additional tariffs on Brazil over the trial of ancient President Jair Bolsonaro, and on India over its purchases of Russian oil.

No matter Friday’s ruling, different sweeping levies remain in region. Mr. Trump ancient one other rules — Part 232 of the 1962 Exchange Growth Act — to slap impose sectoral tariffs on steel and aluminum, vehicles, copper, trot and merchandise like kitchen cabinets worldwide. And the President has a great deal of different alternatives to support taxing imports aggressively.

-AP

The Congress on Friday (February 20, 2026) hailed the U.S. Supreme Court risk hanging down President Donald Trump’s global tariffs and talked about the American machine of tests and balances composed looks to be working.

In a put up on X, Congress identical old secretary in-value communications, Jairam Ramesh, talked about, “Hats off to the U.S. Supreme Court for hanging down President Trump’s complete tariff strategy! Relatively a good risk given its ideological composition.

President Donald Trump composed has alternatives to support taxing imports aggressively even after the Supreme Court struck down the tariffs he imposed final one year on as regards to each and each country on earth.

The Justices didn’t buy the President’s sweeping claims of authority to impose tariffs as he sees fit. Nevertheless Mr. Trump can re-spend tariff powers he deployed in his first term and could perchance attain for others, along side one that dates abet to the Mountainous Depression.

“It’s exhausting to see any pathway right here the place tariffs cease,” talked about Georgetown commerce rules professor Kathleen Claussen. “I’m comely convinced he could perchance also rebuild the tariff panorama he has now the spend of different authorities.”

-AP

In Mexico, which has been vigorously negotiating on tariffs with the administration, President Claudia Sheinbaum renowned the ruling in her morning press briefing, saying “We’re going to support and perceive its attain.”

Mexico, whose ideally suited trading accomplice is the U.S., has been in a space to dodge the brunt of the tariffs by extra aggressively going after drug cartels below stress from the Trump administration. The country now not too prolonged within the past stopped sending oil to its ally Cuba at some level of the identical time Mr. Trump threatened to impose tariffs on countries who sent gas to the island.

-AP

Germany’s VDMA engineering affiliation talked about it feared a 15% ⁠U.S. tariff on EU imports will be ‌reintroduced quickly, warning that ‌uncertainty for firms ‌remained ⁠despite a ⁠U.S. Supreme Court ruling in opposition to President Donald Trump’s global tariffs.

The ‌affiliation talked about that whereas the court docket’s judgment used to be vital, ‌Mr. Trump had loads of appropriate conceivable decisions for imposing such ⁠responsibilities.

The response got right here after the ‌U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 risk, struck down Mr. Trump’s spend of ‌the International Emergency Financial Powers Act to impose the tariffs, ⁠ruling that he ⁠had exceeded his authority.

-Reuters

President Trump described the Supreme Court risk as “a shame” when he used to be notified in real time at some level of his morning assembly with loads of governors.

That’s according to any individual with bid records of the President’s response, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to focus on the non-public conversation. Trump used to be assembly privately with as regards to two dozen governors from each and each occasions when the chance used to be released.

-AP

Swiss industry ‌affiliation Swissmem on Friday welcomed ⁠the U.S. Supreme Court’s ‌risk to strike down ‌President ‌Donald ⁠Trump’s ⁠tariffs, however instructed Switzerland to cease a ‌preliminary deal agreed final one year ‌with Washington to create appropriate easy process.

One at a time, ⁠the Swiss govt talked about ‌that the country’s ruling Federal Council would analyse ‌extra traits and particular impacts of ⁠the Supreme Court ⁠risk.

-Reuters

The US Supreme Court’s ruling on Friday that President Donald Trump exceeded his authority in imposing sweeping tariffs affirms that the levies were “unjustified,” the Canadian Minister to blame for U.S. commerce talked about.

International Exchange Minister Dominic LeBlanc renowned, nevertheless, that tariffs inflicting the most pain in Canada — sector- particular measures affecting the steel, aluminum and auto industries — remained in pressure despite the ruling, promising Ottawa would work with Washington to “create enhance and alternatives on all sides of the border.”

-AFP

A pair of of the cease Democratic lawmakers within the House are celebrating the Supreme Court’s risk hanging down President Donald Trump’s global tariffs.

Acquire. Richard Neal, the rating Democratic lawmaker on the House Ways and Manner Committee, calls the chance “a victory for the American of us, the rule of thumb of rules, and our standing within the worldwide economy.”

Mr. Neal says the tariffs drove up grocery and vitality prices and destabilized dinky firms. He also says the administration need to create shoppers and firms complete.

Acquire. Brendan Boyle, the rating Democrat on the House Price range Committee, talked about the tariffs weakened the economy and made it more challenging for families to create ends meet.

“This present day’s risk is a foremost step toward conserving families and restoring identical old economic equity,” Mr. Boyle talked about.

-AP

Britain expects its privileged trading ‌region with the US ⁠to proceed after a U.S. Supreme Court ‌ruling struck down ‌President Donald Trump’s ‌sweeping ⁠tariffs, the ⁠govt talked about on Friday.

“The U.Okay. enjoys the bottom ‌reciprocal tariffs globally, and below any agonize we ‌build a question to our privileged trading region with the U.S. ⁠to proceed”, a British govt ‌spokesperson talked about in a observation.

“We are in a position to work with the (U.S.) Administration to ‌value how the ruling would per chance hold an ticket on tariffs for the ⁠U.Okay. and the ⁠leisure of the realm.” 

-Reuters

Corporations hold collectively paid billions in tariffs. Many firms, along side the massive-field warehouse chain Costco, hold already lined up for refunds in court docket, and Kavanaugh renowned the process will be now not easy.

“The Court says nothing this day about whether, and if that is the case how, the Authorities could perchance also composed proceed about returning the billions of bucks that it has level-headed from importers. Nevertheless that process is prone to be a ‘mess,’ as used to be acknowledged at oral argument,” Justice Kavanaugh wrote within the dissent.

-AP

U.S. shares are edging higher in tentative trading after the Supreme Court struck down President Trump’s sweeping tariffs, which had been a source of volatility for the market.

The S&P 500 used to be 0.1% higher a fast time after the court docket presented its ruling. It had been drifting between dinky beneficial properties and losses earlier within the morning, after discouraging experiences exhibiting slowing enhance for the economy and faster inflation created moderately few ripples within the market.

The Dow Jones Industrial Realistic added 20 facets, or decrease than 0.1%, and the Nasdaq composite rose 0.1%. Treasury yields also remained barely muted within the bond market.

-AP

Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the court docket’s majority conception, joined by Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, two of Mr. Trump’s three Supreme Court picks. The three liberal justices were also section of the bulk.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Mr. Trump’s different appointee, wrote the first dissent, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito.

-AP

The U.S. Supreme Court struck down on Friday (February 20, 2026) President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs that he pursued below a rules meant to be used in nationwide emergencies, rejecting one in every of his most contentious assertions of his authority in a ruling with predominant implications for the worldwide economy.

The justices, in a 6-3 ruling, ‌upheld a decrease court docket’s risk that the Republican president’s spend of this 1977 rules exceeded his authority. The Supreme Court reached its conclusion in a appropriate topic by firms suffering from the tariffs and 12 U.S. states, most of them Democratic-governed, in opposition to Mr. Trump’s unparalleled spend of this ⁠rules to unilaterally impose the import taxes.

Read the epic right here