The Delhi Excessive Court docket mentioned the cloth filed by OpIndia “prima facie nowhere shows” that Chaturvedi was as soon as occupied with “running extortion rackets” as alleged in the impugned articles. File.
| Photo Credit: The Hindu
A Delhi court docket recently directed the OpIndia to rob away two articles, published round six years ago, about journalist Swati Chaturvedi, holding that the continuing circulation of the objects would possibly perchance well well motive “vital and irreparable hurt” to her legitimate recognition while the defamation swimsuit remains pending.
Meenu Kaushik, district judge, Patiala Home Court docket in an teach dated Also can honest 13 worthy that the “offer articles” produced by the defendants didn’t prima facie reinforce the claims made against Ms Chaturvedi and current her argument that many allegedly defamatory statements will no longer be linked to cloth accessible in the overall public domain.
The court docket made an especially piquant commentary referring to one in every of the critical allegations. It mentioned the cloth filed by OpIndia “prima facie nowhere shows” that Chaturvedi was as soon as occupied with “running extortion rackets” as alleged in the impugned articles.
Court docket noticed that on legend of Ms. Chaturvedi is a journalist and public commentator, her “legitimate recognition and credibility are of paramount significance.”
“….the plaintiff shall suffer irreparable loss and hurt in case the impugned articles continued to be in public domain as the identical would possibly perchance well well proceed to motive hurt to the recognition of the plaintiff.” it mentioned while directing OpIndia to rob away/block the impugned articles at some level of the pendency of the swimsuit/except extra orders.
Of their defence, OpIndia had argued that any injunction would amount to a restriction on free speech and relied on excellent precedents cautioning courts against prior restraint on media publications.
On the more than a few hand, the court docket held that rapid taking down the articles would no longer prejudice the defendants on legend of they stay free to put the true fact of their claims at some level of trial.
Ms. Chaturvedi is represented by imply Akshat Gupta.
Printed – Also can honest 15, 2026 04:46 am IST
