Updated 29 January 2026 at 17:21 IST
The SIT has held 12 officials in price in its investigation into the loss of life of 27-One year-outmoded techie Yuvraj Mehta, whose automobile plunged into a deep waterlogged pit in Noida, per sources. Surprising revelations grasp emerged from the probe dispute, which has been submitted to UP CM Yogi Adityanath.

‘No longer a Unusual Accident’: SIT Blames 12 Officials in Noida Techie Death Case As Surprising Revelations Emerge | Image:
Republic
The Special Investigation Group (SIT) has held 12 officials in price in its investigation into the loss of life of 27-One year-outmoded tool engineer Yuvraj Mehta, whose automobile plunged into a deep waterlogged pit in Noida’s Sector 150, per sources.
Several ravishing revelations grasp emerged from the SIT investigation dispute, which has been submitted to Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath.
The dispute said that this used to be now not a “normal accident” however a failure of a couple of systems, as per sources.
The SIT has found 12 officers and workers responsible of negligence. These encompass personnel from the police, administration, Noida Authority, SDRF/Fire Brigade, and utterly different linked departments.
Key revelations within the dispute (over 600 pages)
Sources printed some key capabilities of the dispute. They encompass:
-A thorough investigation used to be conducted into planning, waterlogging considerations, stormwater drainage, alter room monitoring, and the roles of officers deployed on the positioning.
-The SIT identified the negligent officers following detailed scrutiny.
-The SIT has raised excessive concerns in regards to the almost about 2-hour prolong within the rescue operation, questioning whether or now not there used to be an absence of equipment and if chilly water and fog had been extinct as excuses.
-The mining department would possibly be below scrutiny.
Questions by SIT to Mining Division
As per sources, the questions asked by the Special Investigation group to the mining department encompass:
-When used to be permission obtained to excavate soil from that map?
-How grand royalty used to be paid?
-What used to be the accredited depth and duration of the allow?
-Became as soon as more soil excavated than accredited?
-If excessive mining took place, what circulation did the police and administration lift?
The Mining Division has submitted its full dispute to the SIT, per sources.
Printed By : Ankita Paul
Printed On: 29 January 2026 at 17:21 IST




