The Orissa Excessive Court docket has residing apart the cancellation of a younger issued by the Odisha Mining Company (OMC) for the Kodingamali bauxite mine, directing authorities to proceed with and total the gentle route of.
/odishatv/media/member_avatars/uploadimage/library/16_9/16_9_1/recent_photo_1754896372.webp%20)
Odisha Excessive Court docket quashes OMC’s Kodingamali gentle cancellation
The Orissa Excessive Court docket has residing apart the cancellation of a younger issued by the Odisha Mining Company (OMC) for the Kodingamali bauxite mine, directing authorities to proceed with and total the gentle route of.
The ruling came on a writ petition filed by a non-public firm that had emerged because the successful bidder. A two-judge bench comprising Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice MS Raman suggested the OMC Managing Director and concerned officials to whisk forward with the gentle initiated underneath the ask for proposal dated November 3, 2025.
At ease Direction of and Dispute
The OMC had floated the gentle for picking a mine operator for the Kodingamali bauxite mine, which spans Koraput and Rayagada districts. The mission envisages an annual extraction target of 35 lakh metric tonnes for a interval of 5 years, extendable by one more three years.
Fixed with the petitioner, your entire gentle route of had been done, along side technical analysis, opening of monetary bids, and a reverse auction. The approach culminated in the finalisation of the lowest reveal among 9 techno-commercially qualified bidders. The firm argued that it was therefore entitled to receive the work instruct. On the opposite hand, sooner than the issuance of the work instruct, it found a younger cancellation spy dated January 5, 2026, uploaded on OMC’s portal, prompting it to venture the decision as arbitrary.
Court docket Finds Cancellation Unjustified
Inspecting the topic, the bench observed that after your entire gentle route of had concluded, the petitioner had a legit expectation of being awarded the work instruct. It termed the cancellation spy “bald, cryptic and bereft of motive,” noting that the OMC chairman had overlooked the solutions of technical consultants.
The courtroom rejected OMC’s snort that a new gentle would possibly maybe entice extra bidders, stating that concerns over restrictive stipulations had already been addressed thru a corrigendum for the length of the pre-reveal stage. Concluding that the decision-making route of was wrong, the bench quashed the cancellation spy dated January 5, 2026, and directed OMC to proceed with the gentle.
