The Telangana Excessive Court docket has underscored that daughters, love sons, maintain an equal responsibility to worship increasing older of us, namely when declaring rights over parental property.
Justice B. Vijaysen Reddy made the remarks while hearing a petition filed by a 66‑year‑ragged lady from Suryapet district, who alleged neglect by her son and sought enforcement of directions for the return of property documents and welfare safety. Currently residing with her daughter, she urged the court that local authorities did now not put in force an picture handed in December 2025 below the Maintenance and Welfare of Fogeys and Senior Citizens Act. Despite directions issued by the Earnings Divisional Officer for police and administrative toughen, she claimed subsequent representations yielded no response.
Paying attention to these allegations, the court directed authorities in Suryapet to submit their rationalization and posted the subject for additional hearing on April 15.
Within the midst of the complaints, Justice Reddy expressed excessive anxiousness over the rising assortment of disputes reaching the court below the Senior Citizens Act. He eminent that the court is increasingly being flooded with petitions filed by aged of us seeking reduction against their personal teenagers and expressed anxiousness over the rising assortment of cases where of us leer eviction of their teenagers from their properties. He called it a “excessive social disclose” that reflects altering family dynamics.
“Eviction ought to light ideally be the final step, nonetheless many plot the court seeking it on the outset,” the decide remarked, emphasising the need for resolving disputes within families prior to resorting to litigation.
The decide seen that the responsibility of caring for aged of us cannot be seen as one‑sided, emphasising that it rests on all relatives, irrespective of gender. He cautioned that while property rights are many times asserted, the corresponding responsibility to shield up and toughen of us is equally vital.
He also highlighted a broader social anxiousness, noting that in cases where of us maintain handiest daughters, the responsibility of care naturally falls on them. On the an analogous time, he cautioned against cases where claims over property are made with out corresponding willingness to toughen increasing older of us.
HC denies reduction to disqualified sarpanch
The Telangana Excessive Court docket declined to grant reduction to a disqualified sarpanch of Dhorapally village in Komaram Bheem Asifabad district, who turned into eliminated for no longer meeting the minimal age requirement on the time of filing nomination.
Justice E.V. Venugopal turned into hearing a petition filed by Soyam Sameera, no longer easy her disqualification by the revenue divisional officer (RDO) on the ground that she had no longer attained 21 years of age when she contested the election.
The petitioner argued that due design turned into no longer followed and wondered the authority of the RDO to behave as agency divisional officer in a scheduled home, as Dhorapally falls within a notified agency place.
Govt counsel submitted that the RDO basically based mostly the resolution on records alongside with the Secondary College Certificates marks memo and legitimate certificates issued by the Board of Secondary College Training.
Pushing aside the writ petition, the court held that election disputes ought to light be resolved thru the statutory mechanism of an election petition and no longer thru writ jurisdiction.
The court acknowledged disorders referring to to eligibility and election outcomes ought to light be addressed prior to the competent forum prescribed below regulations, while granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue acceptable remedies.
Crimson Corner Ogle on KVP: HC seeks arrangement, steps from Centre
The Telangana Excessive Court docket on Wednesday directed the Union ministries of home affairs and exterior affairs to file detailed counter affidavits on the Crimson Corner Ogle issued by Interpol against musty Rajya Sabha member K.V.P. Ramachandra Rao.
Justice N. Tukaramji sought clarity from the Union govt on the steps taken so some distance and the unusual arrangement of the glimpse.
The Crimson Corner Ogle turned into issued in 2014 following a inquire of linked to a US indictment in a titanium mining bribery case inspiring alleged irregularities in leases during undivided Andhra Pradesh. Court docket cases were stayed by the Excessive Court docket in 2014, and no additional motion turned into taken.
Within the midst of the hearing, senior counsel R.N. Hemendra Nath Reddy, exhibiting for Rao, acknowledged the case turned into politically motivated and raised throughout the 2014 overall elections. He argued that the subject falls throughout the jurisdiction of the Union govt, namely the home and exterior affairs ministries, and pointed out that no counter affidavits had been filed so some distance.
He also acknowledged the authority to disclose, review or withdraw a Crimson Corner Ogle rests with the Centre in coordination with Interpol, while the feature of the CBI is proscribed to have a study-up motion.
The counsel argued that better than a decade had handed with out progress, affecting the petitioner’s recognition and personal liberty. The court allowed a inquire of to implead the Divulge of Telangana as a respondent, noting that the petition turned into filed prior to the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh.
CBI special counsel T. Srujan Kumar Reddy adversarial the plea, stating that different remedies were on hand. He acknowledged objections shall be raised prior to the review committee in France and wondered the maintainability of the petition prior to the Excessive Court docket. He also referred to provisions below the Extradition Act.
The court expressed anxiousness over the prolong in filing responses by the Union ministries and directed them to submit detailed replies on the arrangement of the Crimson Corner Ogle.
