JPMorgan reportedly offered $1 million settlement against $20 million demand before sexual assault allegations went public

The high-profile JPMorgan sexual harassment lawsuit spicy Chirayu Rana and govt Lorna Hajdini escalates amid disputed allegations

The high-stakes stunning dispute spicy JPMorgan and a sexual harassment lawsuit has taken one other turn, with original revelations highlighting a well-known gap between the settlement reportedly sought by Chirayu Rana and the amount equipped by the bank earlier than the case used to be filed publicly.

Historical JPMorgan banker Chirayu Rana allegedly demanded extra than $20 million from the bank earlier than submitting his lawsuit accusing Lorna Hajdini of sexual abuse, as per the New York Put up. Experiences imply Rana made this ask in June closing year, months earlier than the case became public.

As detailed by the Wall Avenue Journal, JPMorgan later equipped Rana $1 million to resolve the topic. The epic extra states that Daniel K. Kaiser, Rana’s recent legal skilled, proposed a counteroffer of $11.75 million.

The lawsuit, which centres on severe allegations against Lorna Hajdini, used to be filed in New York County Supreme Court docket closing month under the pseudonym “John Doe.” The criticism entails claims that Hajdini drugged Rana with Viagra and compelled him into repeated sexual encounters, along with allegations of racist abuse and assorted demands.

Hajdini and her stunning personnel maintain denied all accusations, with colleagues describing the claims as “whole fan fiction.” JPMorgan has moreover rejected the allegations, stating that an internal investigation chanced on no proof of wrongdoing. The bank talked about it reviewed emails and telephone records from the connected period and chanced on that Hajdini fully cooperated, while Rana did now not.

Beyond the allegations of sexual misconduct, the New York Put up moreover reported extra claims connected to the case. Rana allegedly told JPMorgan supervisors that his father had died in December 2024, enabling him to rob extended bereavement leave; on the other hand, his father used to be later chanced on to be alive.

Rana had beforehand filed an internal criticism in Might well per chance 2025 alleging speed- and gender-essentially essentially based harassment earlier than leaving the bank. He later joined deepest fairness firm Bregal Sagemount however left in early April, rapidly earlier than submitting the lawsuit. JPMorgan has disputed the core claims, stating that Rana and Hajdini reported to assorted managers and that she had no authority over his salary or promotions. His legal skilled has talked about the case will doubtless be supported with proof as court cases continue.

Rana extra alleges that the harassment started in 2024 and included homely physical contact and sigh remarks. He claims Hajdini threatened his profession if he did now not follow her demands and says he used to be later identified with PTSD (post-annoying stress disorder).

Sight accounts cited by the Each day Mail in the high-profile case encompass one alleging that Hajdini invited them to enroll in her in a bedroom at a New York house. Any other ogle reportedly talked about they heard Rana picture Hajdini as making his existence a “residing hell” at work.